Public Law
mohammad najafi kalyani; Mehdi Hadavand; alimohammad fallahzadeh
Abstract
One of the most controversial legal and political issues in recent decades - especially since the 1990s - is the recognition of welfare rights in the constitutions of different countries and how to recognize them. Although it seems that most constitutions have recognized these rights, the status of them ...
Read More
One of the most controversial legal and political issues in recent decades - especially since the 1990s - is the recognition of welfare rights in the constitutions of different countries and how to recognize them. Although it seems that most constitutions have recognized these rights, the status of them in the constitutions does not follow a single pattern, and unlike the first generation of rights, the very existence of these rights is seriously questionable. Despite the diminishing challenges at the international level, internal disagreements persist, and these rights continue to be criticized by various thinkers, especially right-wing thinkers. This issue has led to the inconsistent recognition of these rights in the constitutions of different countries. In this article, we seek to examine the models for identifying welfare rights in constitutions. Given the wide impact of the theories of various thinkers on the current state of these rights, it is necessary to examine the objections to them. The results of the research show that the general principle in identifying these rights is their acceptance as "aspirational goals" in the constitution, and their recognition as a "justiciable right" is an exception.
Public Law
ali mohammad fallahzadeh; mohammad najafi kalyani
Abstract
Most of judgements of the administrative court of justice in relation to the title of " garden" have been issued about the identifying a competent authority for its recognition. In this regard, after the enactment of the law on the reform of the law on the conservation and development of greenbelt in ...
Read More
Most of judgements of the administrative court of justice in relation to the title of " garden" have been issued about the identifying a competent authority for its recognition. In this regard, after the enactment of the law on the reform of the law on the conservation and development of greenbelt in cities in 2009 and the formation of the "Article 7 commission", the court's inappropriate procedure in identifying the "article 12 commission of the land-urban law" as a competent authority for recognition the garden was refurbished. In contrast, and because of misinterpretations of the governing laws, one of the issues that have overlooked by the judges was the attention to characteristics of the "garden" and its nature. The present text deals with the court's different and sometimes divergent procedures on the above issues. Also, the nature of article 7 commission and its decisions to identify the competent authority to overseeing them, as well as the decision-making authority for changing the use of gardens, are other issues besides identifying the competent authority to identify the garden, that form the main concern of this article.
